Buy A House AFTER the Tax Credit Expires

10.31.09

no this is not a trick or treat type of joke – I’m serious! If you’re in the market for real estate, wait until after the tax credit ends. Why? I will give you a few moments to think it through……………………………………………..

OK enough time? You got the reason? Here’s why…

According to Bloomberg, car sales dropped 23% after Cash for Clunkers expired. Cash for Clunkers and the $8,000 tax credit for new home buyers are both what my old business school professor would call “gimmicks.”

CFC was a much higher percentage of a car price than the home buyer credit is of a home price, so this should exacerbate the issue. In a nutshell, some people will frantically rush around to get a house before the credit expires – this will cause some people who might have waited a little longer, to buy sooner. This frenzy (highlighted on some TV news shows and which Congressmen even say it works only because it creates a ‘sense of urgency‘), will cause home prices to rise a bit along with the increased demand.

But what do you think will happen the day after the credit expires? yeah you got my drift – there will likely be a demand vacuum and I would hypothesize that you could get more than $8,000 off of an asking price AFTER the credit ends, when fewer buyers are around – especially if it’s offseason. It looks like they might expand the credit until June 2010 – just as the Spring home buying season ends – therefore, next summer might be a good target time to start making offers, unless we have the usually awful and slow winter (when I bought my home).

If you don’t want to be broke, don’t make broke people decisions – buy when others don’t. BE A CONTRARIAN! I hear so many sheep (people) say they will buy in the Spring – how dumb is that? How DUMB is that? I’ll give you an example. A few years back, a nice house listed in Medford, MA for $540,000. It did not sell as the market was growing weaker – all through the summer, fall, and winter it did not sell as the seller lowered the asking price all the way to $460,000! The seller took the listing off the market in February the following year, then relisted in late March and sold it for $540,000.  Some fool could’ve had the house $80,000 cheaper but perhaps this buyer didn’t “go out looking” until Spring – a costly mistake.

Go against the grain – if you can find a great deal with the credit, great – but I would guess you’d find an even better deal after the credit expires. By the way, to be an ultimate contrarian, you may want to avoid real estate altogether. We may need another 15% to the downside to factor in future rate increases and further unemployment. Just a thought…

posted by:

Chris Grande

US Mint’s Lincoln Coin & Chronicles Set is Beautiful

10.30.09

I just received in the mail my order for the US Mint’s Lincoln Coin & Chronicles set. I must say, it is absolutely beautifully done. The Set contains a silver dollar of Lincoln (first time I think he has been on a silver dollar? not sure – perhaps a coin afficionado can help out?). It also contains the 4 pennies minted this year chronicling Lincoln’s life.

The case is beautiful too – bound, classic look with the Gettysburg Address written 0n the inside – the last 45 words are also engraved on the back of the coin!

For those of you that love history and/or collect coins, this is a beauty. Apparently though, it sold out the next day:(. If you can find a dealer with a copy, buy it – it was $55 – and definitely worth it. Here is a link to the product of which they only made 50,000:

US Mint

Posted by:

Chris Grande

Bigger Government = Bigger Corruption

7.31.09

Let’s get right to the action shall we? In an amusing but sad commentary about the recent string of new Jersey corruption arrests, the Wall Street Journal stated that new Jersey created 55,800 government jobs between 2000 and 2007, versus only 6,800 private sector jobs.

WSJ Article HERE

This mirrors what Marc Faber mentioned and I discussed last week that the government sector nationwide created over 2.4M jobs where the private sector lost over 5.5M jobs in the last decade – as I mentioned, the undynamic, lethargic gov’t sector is not where you want your jobs being created for growth. Government jobs drain tax dollars and don’t usually spur economic growth and higher tax revenue.

What the Wall Street Journal pointed out as an additional problem with bigger government is bigger corruption. With many layers of government, it is easier to hide illicit acts. And government leaders have power over certain things – permitting, zoning, taxes, environmental approvals, etc – that those in the private sector don’t have. If I had a choice, I would prefer corporate corruption because they have less of a chance of controlling the general public with influence over government processes (ideally). Government corruption is VERY dangerous.

under our current plans, I can see Obama trying to solve the unemployment problem by having government hire another 10m people. With new programs and such, there will be new opportunities for corruption by leaders running inefficient programs. How many of you think the Department of Homeland Security is efficient? ‘Nuff Said…

Chris Grande

P.S. FYI: the governor of New jersey is John Corzine, formerly of Government Sachs (I mean Goldman Sachs), another corrupt organization that got too many handouts during the Fall 2008 porkfest.

Maryland’s Progressive Taxers Get the Slap They Deserve

7.17.09

In the “interesting but EXPECTED” twist department:

Maryland attempted last year to hit high earners with a surtax in order to balance their budget.  According to a Wall Street Journal Article, The governor said that these people were “willing and able to pay their fair share.” (Love the fair share language, it’s so subjectively based to the perspective of the person speaking).

Apparently some weren’t so willing. Tax filers in that bracket (above $1M income) dropped from 3,000 to 2,000 last year. Read the article:

Wall Street Journal

Perhaps the economy had an affect but I’m sure more than a few picked up and left for Florida. This is a taste for the US if all of these clowns in Congress start surtaxing Americans. We will see productive Americans leaving the US to set up shop elsewhere (Singapore, New Zealand, Eastern Europe, Hong Kong?). And overall tax revenues will decline further.

The lack of basic economic knowledge among Americans is the only reason ridiculous arguments such as raising taxes on productive people gets any merit. if people knew, or even if more people knew what went into growing and running a normal business (no ipo money types), they would understand that it makes sense to stimulate and attractive creative, enterprising people with low cost of capital and low taxes on the fruits of their labor – then they will be more willing to come here and create jobs.

For an interesting analysis of incentives, including immigration law follies, see my articles on A123 systems and its immigrant founder HERE.

Chris Grande